RE: Question regarding Update ... LEFT JOIN

2007-01-03 Thread Jonathan Langevin
total time used for a SELECT lock) -Original Message- From: Jonathan Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 4:49 PM To: Jerry Schwartz; mysql@lists.mysql.com Subject: RE: Question regarding Update ... LEFT JOIN That would be fine with me, but then conversely

RE: Question regarding Update ... LEFT JOIN

2007-01-03 Thread Jonathan Langevin
; mysql@lists.mysql.com Subject: RE: Question regarding Update ... LEFT JOIN I hope it is locking both tables. Even if you aren't changing any fields in the right-hand column, you don't want anyone changing it under you. I hope that, if you aren't actually modifying the right-hand table,

RE: Question regarding Update ... LEFT JOIN

2007-01-03 Thread Jerry Schwartz
bal Information Incorporated 195 Farmington Ave. Farmington, CT 06032 860.674.8796 / FAX: 860.674.8341 > -Original Message- > From: Jonathan Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 4:13 PM > To: mysql@lists.mysql.com > Subject: Question regarding

Question regarding Update ... LEFT JOIN

2007-01-03 Thread Jonathan Langevin
I've used the syntax, UPDATE ... LEFT JOIN a few times in the past, and today I used it again for a new employer that I work for. Several of my associates were unaware that the UPDATE ... LEFT JOIN syntax is valid in MySQL. After I demonstrated that the query does indeed work fine on our MySQL 5.x