really really a little noisy.
这下犯众怒了吧，招人烦了~ 囧
Best regards,
Sharl.Jimh.Tsin (From China **Obviously Taiwan INCLUDED**)
2010/12/29 杨涛涛 :
> Ok, I'll not post any more! Just reading!
>
>
> David Yeung, In China, Beijing.
> My First Blog:http://yueliangdao0608.cublog.cn
> My Second Blog:http://yu
Ok, I'll not post any more! Just reading!
David Yeung, In China, Beijing.
My First Blog:http://yueliangdao0608.cublog.cn
My Second Blog:http://yueliangdao0608.blog.51cto.com
My Msn: yueliangdao0...@gmail.com
在 2010年12月23日 下午8:14，Johan De Meersman 写道：
> Glad to hear I'm not the only one annoy
Glad to hear I'm not the only one annoyed :-) I've plonked him in the
meantime.
2010/12/23 Jorg W Young
>
> This guy has been saying nothing meaningful on this list, but
> advertise his blog everywhere.
> Just be shame. He should be kicked out from the list.
>
> Jorg.
>
> 2010/12/23 杨涛涛 :
> > Th
This guy has been saying nothing meaningful on this list, but
advertise his blog everywhere.
Just be shame. He should be kicked out from the list.
Jorg.
2010/12/23 杨涛涛 :
> This way is very well, but it has to do lots of human work.
> David Yeung, In China, Beijing.
> My First Blog:http://yuelian
This way is very well, but it has to do lots of human work.
David Yeung, In China, Beijing.
My First Blog:http://yueliangdao0608.cublog.cn
My Second Blog:http://yueliangdao0608.blog.51cto.com
My Msn: yueliangdao0...@gmail.com
2010/11/24 Rolando Edwards
> MySQL, by design, cannot do that.
>
>
inal Message-
From: Rolando Edwards [mailto:redwa...@logicworks.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 6:53 AM
To: Machiel Richards; mysql mailing list
Subject: RE: Another replication question
MySQL, by design, cannot do that.
A DB Server can be Master to Multiple Slaves
Think of the CHANGE
MySQL, by design, cannot do that.
A DB Server can be Master to Multiple Slaves
Think of the CHANGE MASTER TO command.
Its internal design cannot accommodate reading from more than one set of relay
logs.
You could attempt something convoluted, like
1) STOP SLAVE;
2) CHANGE MASTER TO
3) START SLA
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:50 PM, John Daisley wrote:
> Are you sure mmm couldn't handle this?
>
That, I don't know, but MySQL's internal replication mechanisms definitely
don't support multimaster slaves. If mmm does it, it'll likely be akin to
the offline log shipping I proposed earlier.
> May
Johan,
Are you sure mmm couldn't handle this?
Machiel,
Maybe you could `simulate` the whole thing using some federated tables on
one of the slave instances? Then although you are replicating to 3 instances
you could access all the data from a single instance?
Regards
John
On 24 November 2010
You can't, plain and simple - a slave may only have a single master.
You could script binlog shipping, I suppose, if you're so inclined, and
apply them on the slave. No guarantees about it working as expected, though.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Machiel Richards wrote:
> Hi All
>
>I am
Hi Ross,
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 16:44, Ross Simpson wrote:
> I have another question that doesn't seem to be addressed in the mysql
> manual.
>
> Does any sort of locking occur while a slave is updating it's local
> databases? Can I still read any/all tables while this process is
> occurring?
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
