Re: Date Field Reverting to 0000-00-00 Format

2006-03-27 Thread Lola J. Lee Beno
Michael Stassen wrote: So, take a look at yarn_date.txt and let us know. Yes, you're right . . . there was an extra tab stop. When I deleted the extra tab, the date field were retained successfully. Thanks! -- Lola - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lolajl.net | Blog at http://www.l

Re: Date Field Reverting to 0000-00-00 Format

2006-03-26 Thread Michael Stassen
Lola J. Lee Beno wrote: Here's an example of one of the tables where the date was retained successfully, with the string to the right of the decimal point being trimmed: 1Cobweb2005-01-13 15:21:50.654149 2Lace Weight2005-01-13 15:21:50.654149 3Sock2005-01-13 15:21:50.6

Re: Date Field Reverting to 0000-00-00 Format

2006-03-26 Thread Lola J. Lee Beno
Michael Stassen wrote: Just a quick reply for now . . . Ummm, if you delete the numbers to the *left* of the decimal point, "2005-01-15 10:15:42.41837" will turn into ".41837", which is still not a valid datetime. You need to delete the numbers to the *right* of the decimal point (which I ex

Re: Date Field Reverting to 0000-00-00 Format

2006-03-25 Thread Michael Stassen
Lola J. Lee Beno wrote: I have a bunch of data where one of the columns is a date field. Here's a sample of the data that I have: 141415010001 02005-01-15 10:15:42.41837 281512010002 02005-01-15 10:22:37.756594 36

Re: DATE field key depends on value?

2006-01-23 Thread sheeri kritzer
Thanx, that's exactly it. I feel a bit embarassed as this came up on the list about 2-3 weeks ago, and I found the answer as I was waiting for the replies. -Sheeri On 1/20/06, gerald_clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sheeri kritzer wrote: > > >Hi folks, > > > >I'm attempting to optimize a quer

Re: DATE field key depends on value?

2006-01-20 Thread gerald_clark
sheeri kritzer wrote: Hi folks, I'm attempting to optimize a query -- it's quite a simple one, actually. SELECT uid from Bill_Sales WHERE startDate > '[some date]'; mysql> show create table Bill_Sales\G *** 1. row *** Table: Bill_Sales Cre

Re: DATE field key depends on value?

2006-01-20 Thread sheeri kritzer
Realized I should probably show the Bill_Sales table. . . ls -lh Bill_Sales.* -rw-rw 1 mysql mysql 104M Jan 20 15:11 Bill_Sales.MYD -rw-rw 1 mysql mysql 97M Jan 20 15:11 Bill_Sales.MYI -rw-rw 1 mysql mysql 9.2K Jan 3 13:43 Bill_Sales.frm mysql> show table status like "Bill_Sales"

RE: Date Field

2003-10-26 Thread Freddie Sorensen
Eduardo Use the format '-mm-dd' instead By the way, there is an excellent manual on http://www.mysql.com including all the field types and formats Freddie -Original Message- From: Eduardo Melo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sonntag, 26. Oktober 2003 16:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Date field

2002-12-09 Thread Benjamin Pflugmann
Hello. On Sun 2002-12-08 at 16:03:22 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I am trying to store a date in the following format '08/12/2002' pr > '08/12/2002' or any other format if I have to ...on SQLServer 7. This is the mysql list. What has SQLServer 7 to do with MySQL? > Basically I want to us

Re: date field - default value = current date

2002-09-18 Thread Paul DuBois
At 1:32 -0700 9/18/02, neal wrote: >Is there a wat to have mySQL auto fill in the current date into my >dateCreated field? > >In SQLServer I would simply specify the getDate() method as a default value. >I presume I would use the analogous MySQL function curDate() but it does not >appear to work f

re: date field - default value = current date

2002-09-18 Thread Egor Egorov
neal, Wednesday, September 18, 2002, 11:32:39 AM, you wrote: n> Is there a wat to have mySQL auto fill in the current date into my n> dateCreated field? n> In SQLServer I would simply specify the getDate() method as a default value. n> I presume I would use the analogous MySQL function curDate()

Re: date field - default value = current date

2002-09-18 Thread Mikhail Entaltsev
Check TIMESTAMP type in the documentation. Best regards, Mikhail. - Original Message - From: "neal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "mySQL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 10:32 AM Subject: date field - default value = current date > Is there a wat to have mySQL auto fi

Re: Date Field + Time Field = Datetime Field?

2002-01-11 Thread DL Neil
From: "Anvar Hussain K.M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 11 January 2002 04:05 Subject: Re: Date Field + Time Field = Datetime Field? > Hi Alex, > > I don't think your problem will solved by making the time columns to full > datetime c

Re: Date Field + Time Field = Datetime Field?

2002-01-10 Thread Anvar Hussain K.M.
Hi Alex, I don't think your problem will solved by making the time columns to full datetime columns as there is no functions to subtract two datetime values directly. But you can can keep the time columns and go on like this: convert the time into seconds using time_to_sec function. subtract f

RE: Date Field Help

2001-07-23 Thread Don Read
On 23-Jul-2001 Mike Mike wrote: > Hi Folks, > I'm trying to create a counter for my website. I'm > trying to pull the last 7 days worth of data out of > mysql. My sql statement is as follows. > > SELECT TheDate, Count(TheDate) AS CountOfdate > FROM Counter > WHERE (((TheDate)=Now()-7)) > GROUP

Re: Date Field Help

2001-07-23 Thread David Ecker
Of course, 0 records are ok. Here is an example of mine : mysql> select now(), now()-7; +-++ | now() | now()-7| +-++ | 2001-07-23 21:45:53 | 20010723214546 | +-++ 1 r

Re: DATE field with current date as default ?

2001-01-15 Thread Scott Baker
Use the "timestamp" datatype instead of date. At 05:19 PM 1/13/2001 -0500, you wrote: >Hello, > >Is there a way to have a field of type DATE get the current date as its >default? > >Something like ... > >mydatefield DATE DEFAULT curdate() > >...which does not work. But that's the idea. ---

Re: DATE field with current date as default ?

2001-01-13 Thread Paul DuBois
>Hello, > >Is there a way to have a field of type DATE get the current date as its >default? No. Default values in MySQL must be constants. > >Something like ... > >mydatefield DATE DEFAULT curdate() > >...which does not work. But that's the idea. -- Paul DuBois, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---