Re: Disk-bound joins

2001-09-26 Thread Jason Brooke
> Ask it and see... > > EXPLAIN SELECT > > Jeremy mysql> exlain why youre not writing all (non-select) queries to the binary log when replicating databases; ERROR 1064: You have an error in your SQL syntax near 'exlain why youre not writing all (non-select) queries to the binary log when r

Re: Disk-bound joins

2001-09-26 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 05:16:26AM -0400, Will French wrote: > Thanks for responding. > > That's interesting. I will definitely give your sugestion a try. I thought > the two syntaxs had the same effect. What does the optimizer do > differently? Ask it and see... EXPLAIN SELECT Jerem

RE: Disk-bound joins

2001-09-26 Thread Will French
ber 26, 2001 5:12 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Disk-bound joins > > > Hi, > > Excuse me if this is wrong, but I think its the INNER JOIN which > is slowing > down the query. > > Wouldnt it be better (less memory intens

RE: Disk-bound joins

2001-09-26 Thread Andrew Murphy
Hi, Excuse me if this is wrong, but I think its the INNER JOIN which is slowing down the query. Wouldnt it be better (less memory intensive) to just use: "FROM zipwork1 as z, pctwork1 as p WHERE z.run_id = p.run_id" to join the tables if they are 1-1 related. Andrew Murphy -Original