On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 03:43:14PM -0500, mos wrote:
> Correct, which is why I have a means of compressing and *encrypting* the
> .exe file. I can also lock it to the person's machine (or server) so it
> won't fall into the wrong hands.
All such methods have been broken.
If they weren't, the ma
At 11:36 AM 5/27/2003, you wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: mos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I could encrypt certain table fields, but this will make
> writing the front
> end a pain because all SQL statements will now need to be
> changed any time
> a new column is encrypted.
It also w
At 02:22 PM 5/27/2003, you wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: mos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Correct, which is why I have a means of compressing and
> *encrypting* the .exe file.
I don't understand how this helps... The EXE file has to contain a complete
decryption routine or it can't
> -Original Message-
> From: mos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I could encrypt certain table fields, but this will make
> writing the front
> end a pain because all SQL statements will now need to be
> changed any time
> a new column is encrypted.
It also won't help you any, because t
