om: Arthur Fuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:57 PM
>To: Jonathan Hilgeman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: I thought MySQL Supported Relationships
>
>
>Perhaps I fail to catch the humour in your response, or the flavour of this
>newsgroup, but I find yo
Jonathan Hilgeman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: I thought MySQL Supported Relationships
Perhaps I fail to catch the humour in your response, or the flavour of this
newsgroup, but I find your answer in no way helpful, and beyond that quite
insulting to Access.
1. I have developed applications
n Hilgeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Andrew Kuebler'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:43 PM
Subject: RE: I thought MySQL Supported Relationships
> Actually, no. The addiction to MySQL has caused many relationship
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 14:35, Andrew Kuebler wrote:
> Hello Everyone.
>
> I'm still fairly a newbie to MySQL, but I could have sworn I read
> somewhere that MySQL supported relationships just like Access. I've
> searched the entire manual, and cannot find anything on the subject.
> Does MySQL supp
* Andrew Kuebler
> I'm still fairly a newbie to MySQL, but I could have sworn I read
> somewhere that MySQL supported relationships just like Access. I've
> searched the entire manual, and cannot find anything on the subject.
> Does MySQL support relationships, and if so does anyone know where I c
Actually, no. The addiction to MySQL has caused many relationship break-ups.
There's probably even a database with that information out there somewhere.
Probably a MySQL database, too. Meanwhile Access supports relationships
because it blows so hard that people can't wait to get away from it and h
