On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 08:02:20AM +0200, Svensson, B.A.T. (HKG) wrote:
>
> Do you have any idea how well MySQL scales with tables containing
> some 10th of million rows of data?
How about 280 million? We've got one that big. It performs very
well--because we have it properly indexed and don't
> I'm not a suitable person to compare MySQL against other databases but MySQL
> will cope with this size of database if the tables are properly indexed and
> your queries optomised. Here our main database has over 90 tables and several
> of our tablse hold about the amount of data your'll acrue
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 05:15:10PM +1200, Sam Minnee wrote:
>
> I've been asked to put together a very large (well, it's large to
> me) database, and while mySQL is great for my current uses, I
> haven't had experience with stuff of this scale.
>
> The database will have about 88 tables, with up
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002, Sam Minnee wrote:
> I've been asked to put together a very large (well, it's large to me)
> database, and while mySQL is great for my current uses, I haven't had
> experience with stuff of this scale.
>
> The database will have about 88 tables, with up to 100 fields per table
