daniel,
Monday, November 11, 2002, 3:51:25 AM, you wrote:
d will 4.1 hopefully have stored procedure functionality ?
Nope.
Stored procedures will be implemented around v5.0
--
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This email is sponsored by Ensita.net
: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: re: RE: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects
daniel,
Monday, November 11, 2002, 3:51:25 AM, you wrote:
d will 4.1 hopefully have stored procedure functionality ?
Nope.
Stored procedures will be implemented around v5.0
--
For technical support
,
Greg.
- Original Message -
From: Dan Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Victoria Reznichenko [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:04 PM
Subject: RE: RE: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects
damn , i read it was 4.1 i guess we have to wait a bit then, i wish i
could
program
Message-
From: Greg Matthews [mailto:greg55;ozemail.com.au]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 7:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects and not stored procedures
hey, can i hijack my message back?...this thread is about the performance of
subselects, not stored procedures
: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 12:02 AM
Subject: RE: RE: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects and not stored procedures
I'm not sure where you're getting your information (Typically, db vendors
recommend you use an exists clause, not a join when testing for the
presence
of child data because it's faster
11:04 PM
Subject: RE: RE: MySql 4.1 Sub Selects
damn , i read it was 4.1 i guess we have to wait a bit then, i wish i
could
program some c ++ to hurry it along a bit, i dont really have access to
DB's
like oracle to learn stored procedure stuff
-Original Message-
From
