RE: RE: query question...

2006-12-08 Thread bruce
dan... thanks!!! like a charm.. now for the other 200 queries i'm dealing with!! -Original Message- From: Dan Buettner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 1:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Peter Bradley; mysql@lists.mysql.com Subject: Re: RE: query que

Re: RE: query question...

2006-12-08 Thread Dan Buettner
Just add a DISTINCT: SELECT DISTINCT t1.universityID FROM SvnTBL t1 WHERE t1.universityID NOT IN (SELECT t2.universityID FROM SvnTBL t2 WHERE t2.actionID = 2); Dan On 12/8/06, bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi peter. thanks, the solution you gave me is close...!! my actual data i

Re: Re: Query question

2006-10-18 Thread Erick Carballo
Dan, your suggestion is *exactly* what I needed! Furthermore, because of the use of the subquery, there is no need to join to table to itself, so the query may be simplified to: mysql> SELECT distinct loc1.imageId -> FROM locBridgeImageLocLevel5 as loc1 -> WHERE loc1.locLevel5Id

Re: Re: Query question

2006-10-17 Thread Dan Buettner
I see what's happening, Erick. It's matching all the rows in loc1 and loc2 with the same image id. It *is* excluding 13128, but image id 1 is still appearing because of the rows where they match *besides* 13128. For example, 18302 and actually also 2356 since you're joining a table on itself. S