- Original Message -
From: Paul Fine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:37 AM
Subject: The correct way to deal with name_1, name_2, name_3
Greetings, I would be greatful for any advice on the correct way to do
this.
If I have something
Thanks.
I do mean Do you mean one column for each name, in which case these would
comprise 10 columns, most of which would have NULL most of the time?
Is this your suggestion in this case:
Table 1
| blahblah | blah | blah | CustID (PK) |
Table 2
| CustID (FK) | Name |
Table 2 Sample Data
|
- Original Message -
From: Paul Fine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Stephen Fromm' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 11:49 AM
Subject: RE: The correct way to deal with name_1, name_2, name_3
Thanks.
I do mean Do you mean one column for each name, in which
