Hi.
Thanks for the proposal, but my test was with the C library, not with
ODBC as the original one. Aside from that: It's too fast. Using ODBC
only could have made it slower, so it's still to fast regardless.
Bye,
Benjamin.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 09:29:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
This is a guess, but I would assume that would wouldn't get accurate result
by using ODBC.
If you write your test in C, you may as well use the C library available and
not use ODBC.
Just my 0.02$ worth.
Daniel
>
> Hi.
>
> I believe you missed his point: He expected a time difference but d
