Re: upgrading to v 4.1

2003-05-31 Thread LS
4.8-STABLE and linuxthreads-2.2.3_10 and gcc3.2 It's easy for me to reproduce this bug on my system, but I don't know if I could come up with a simple test case for someone to play with. Do you compile with the BUILT_OPTIMIZED flag? --- Jeremy Zawodny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May

Re: upgrading to v 4.1

2003-05-29 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 03:42:24PM -0700, LS wrote: > > I don't know about Mac OS X, but I can tell you that with 4.1 on > FreeBSD w/LinuxThreads, my application's query threads get hung up > almost instantly, requiring a kill -9. > > When I back down to 4.0.13 (and 3.23), I don't see that particu

Re: upgrading to v 4.1

2003-05-29 Thread LS
n "opening table" state > when doing a show processlist ? > If this is the case, I'm experiencing the same problem here with Linux. > > Regards, > Jocelyn > - Original Message - > From: "LS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Ted Rogers&

Re: upgrading to v 4.1

2003-05-29 Thread Jocelyn Fournier
D]> To: "Ted Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 12:42 AM Subject: Re: upgrading to v 4.1 > I don't know about Mac OS X, but I can tell you that with 4.1 on FreeBSD > w/LinuxThreads, my application's query threa

Re: upgrading to v 4.1

2003-05-29 Thread LS
I don't know about Mac OS X, but I can tell you that with 4.1 on FreeBSD w/LinuxThreads, my application's query threads get hung up almost instantly, requiring a kill -9. When I back down to 4.0.13 (and 3.23), I don't see that particular problem anymore. So keep an eye out for how it behaves for

RE: upgrading to v 4.1

2003-05-29 Thread Kieran Kelleher
Ted, 4.1 is not in production release yet. So, for home development to test or develop for new features specific to 4.1, then OK. If your database server is for production use serving critical data, then use 4.0.13 which is the current production release. Follow the instructions carefully a

RE: upgrading to v 4.1

2003-05-29 Thread Daevid Vincent
ginal Message- > From: Scott Haneda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 1:59 PM > To: MySql > Subject: Re: upgrading to v 4.1 > > > on 05/28/2003 1:51 PM, Ted Rogers at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Is it recommended that I upgrade MySQL 3.23.53 t

Re: upgrading to v 4.1

2003-05-29 Thread Scott Haneda
on 05/28/2003 1:51 PM, Ted Rogers at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is it recommended that I upgrade MySQL 3.23.53 to 4.1.x? Are then any > special notes I might remember when doing so? > (Mac OS X Server 10.2.6) > > Ted Yeah, I posted this and no reply, but you need to do this Subject : mysql_fi