On Thursday 26 September 2002 12:35 pm, Andrew Braithwaite scribbled something
about:
> Hi Bence,
>
> We are running mysql with over 1,000 tables - plenty of them have 10
> Million to 40 Milion records (Geographic data) - about 500 concurrent
> sessions doing about 800 to 1000 queries total per s
Hi Bence,
We are running mysql with over 1,000 tables - plenty of them have 10 Million
to 40 Milion records (Geographic data) - about 500 concurrent sessions doing
about 800 to 1000 queries total per second at peak.
We haven't had any problems in the last 2.5 years. (our system is read heavy
&
Greetings...
I believe MySQL is stable and fast enuf for your puprpose. And its pretty
easy to start up.
Insane
- Original Message -
From: "Bence Szabo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 7:52 PM
Subject: what about the stability?
> Hi,
> Thi
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Bence Szabo wrote:
> Are there any experiences with it? (Our planned system about 5M records
> and intensive web based queryes, I don't know exactly estimated how many
> concurrent sessions)
Bence,
that's where MySQL shines. But beware of the file size limit inherent to
you
