Re: why ever use TINYBLOB/TEXT -- isn't VARCHAR same size? (fwd)

2001-11-13 Thread Robert Alexander
At 16:07 + 2001/11/13, Carl Troein wrote: >//C - with a runny nose, a cup of tea, and a glass of Laphroaig ...for medicinal purposes, of course. :> My choice was McClellands, when reduced last week to a sorry-ass blob of protoplasm by the worst cold I've had in years. Feeling much better

Re: why ever use TINYBLOB/TEXT -- isn't VARCHAR same size?

2001-11-13 Thread Aaron Williams
At 4:07 PM + 11/13/01, Carl Troein wrote: >Carsten H. Pedersen writes: > >> I assume that there is a small speed penalty in using TEXT/BLOB >> fields, as compared to VARCHARs. > >I recall seeing some test where TEXT was actually faster, but >it might have been in some special situation. On t

RE: why ever use TINYBLOB/TEXT -- isn't VARCHAR same size?

2001-11-13 Thread Carsten H. Pedersen
> http://www.mysql.com/doc/n/o/node_357.html > > explains the different string data types and the storage requirements: > > Column Type Storage required > [...] > VARCHAR(M) L+1 bytes, where L <= M and 1 <= M <= 255 > [...] > TINYBLOB, TINYTEXT L+1 bytes, where L < 2^