Guilhem,
this is a known problem and mentioned in the Restrictions section of the
InnoDB online manual.
It is not the correct way to run SQL statements in the autocommit mode on
the slave server, while the master has normal transaction processing on.
I have asked Sasha to add COMMIT marks to th
Guilhem,
this is a known problem and mentioned in the Restrictions section of the
InnoDB online manual.
It is not the correct way to run SQL statements in the autocommit mode on
the slave server, while the master has normal transaction processing on.
I have asked Sasha to add COMMIT marks to th
Hi!
> "Heikki" == Heikki Tuuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Heikki> Guilhem,
Heikki> this is a known problem and mentioned in the Restrictions section of the
Heikki> InnoDB online manual.
Heikki> It is not the correct way to run SQL statements in the autocommit mode on
Heikki> the slave ser
Hi!
> "Heikki" == Heikki Tuuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Heikki> Guilhem,
Heikki> this is a known problem and mentioned in the Restrictions section of the
Heikki> InnoDB online manual.
Heikki> It is not the correct way to run SQL statements in the autocommit mode on
Heikki> the slave ser
Guilhem,
this is a known problem and mentioned in the Restrictions section of the
InnoDB online manual.
It is not the correct way to run SQL statements in the autocommit mode on
the slave server, while the master has normal transaction processing on.
I have asked Sasha to add COMMIT marks to th