Re: Easy or not so easy GROUP BY

2005-10-13 Thread Ed Reed
Can anyone please help me with this? I'm just not getting it. - Thanks Ed Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/6/05 2:50:46 PM Thanks for the reply, Sorry; I'm using 4.1.11 Thanks again. Pooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/6/05 1:51 AM 2005/10/6, Ed Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] : I'm trying to group some sub

Re: Easy or not so easy GROUP BY

2005-10-13 Thread SGreen
(response bottom-posted) Ed Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/13/2005 12:36:24 PM: Can anyone please help me with this? I'm just not getting it. - Thanks Ed Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/6/05 2:50:46 PM Thanks for the reply, Sorry; I'm using 4.1.11 Thanks again. Pooly [EMAIL

Re: Easy or not so easy GROUP BY

2005-10-10 Thread Ed Reed
Can anyone please help me with this? I'm just not getting it. - Thanks Ed Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/6/05 2:50:46 PM Thanks for the reply, Sorry; I'm using 4.1.11 Thanks again. Pooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/6/05 1:51 AM 2005/10/6, Ed Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] : I'm trying to group some sub

Re: Easy or not so easy GROUP BY

2005-10-06 Thread Pooly
2005/10/6, Ed Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm trying to group some sub categories with a concatenated result. I'm trying to get the max sub for each item per month. I think it should be fairly easy but it is kicking my butt. My data looks like this, +++--+ | month | item

Re: Easy or not so easy GROUP BY

2005-10-06 Thread Ed Reed
Thanks for the reply, Sorry; I'm using 4.1.11 Thanks again. Pooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/6/05 1:51 AM 2005/10/6, Ed Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] : I'm trying to group some sub categories with a concatenated result. I'm trying to get the max sub for each item per month. I think it should be