Re: [MySQL] Re: Image Store @ My SQL

2010-01-30 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
Vikram A wrote: Is it So? then i may have the following, when ever i want the image of a i need look for the share machine! If it is not available it may cause some difficulties. 1) NFS sharing a file (any file) is better suited for this task. 2) The DB should only hold the file path

Re: Image Store @ My SQL

2010-01-30 Thread Colin Streicher
Please share your knowledge > > Thank you > > > > > > > > From: Walter Heck > To: Vikram A > Cc: MY SQL Mailing list > Sent: Sat, 30 January, 2010 3:16:11 PM > Subject: Re: Image Store @ My SQL > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 19:03, Vikram A wrote: > >

Re: Image Store @ My SQL

2010-01-30 Thread Vikram A
January, 2010 3:16:11 PM Subject: Re: Image Store @ My SQL On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 19:03, Vikram A wrote: > I am not clear with your answer, can you please explain it? Well, MySQL (as most databases) is not really suited for storing images. If you create a networked storage that you can sh

Re: Image Store @ My SQL

2010-01-30 Thread Walter Heck
Bad idea. Sotring images is what a file system is for. Create an NFS or other networked storage and store your images there. I don't see the problem? good luck, Walter Heck Engineer @ Open Query (http://openquery.com) On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 18:54, Vikram A wrote: > Hi, > > I am using MYSQL wit

Re: Image Store @ My SQL

2010-01-30 Thread Walter Heck
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 19:03, Vikram A wrote: > I am not clear with your answer, can you please explain it? Well, MySQL (as most databases) is not really suited for storing images. If you create a networked storage that you can share between both locations, that would solve your problem, right?

Re: Image Store @ My SQL

2010-01-30 Thread Vikram A
Store @ My SQL Bad idea. Sotring images is what a file system is for. Create an NFS or other networked storage and store your images there. I don't see the problem? good luck, Walter Heck Engineer @ Open Query (http://openquery.com) On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 18:54, Vikram A wrote: > Hi,