Re: InnoDB crash on 3.23.49a...

2002-05-28 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 01:16:28PM -0700, Jeremy Zawodny wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:59:45PM +0300, Heikki Tuuri wrote: > > Jeremy, > > > > can you build your own 3.23.51? There is actually the same memory > > overwrite bug in gethostname_r of glibc/Linux in .49a as in .50. > > I'll inst

Re: InnoDB crash on 3.23.49a...

2002-05-28 Thread Heikki Tuuri
gt; Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:18 PM Subject: Re: InnoDB crash on 3.23.49a... > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:59:45PM +0300, Heikki Tuuri wrote: > > Jeremy, > > > > can you build your own 3.23.51? There is actually the same memory overwrit

Re: InnoDB crash on 3.23.49a...

2002-05-28 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:59:45PM +0300, Heikki Tuuri wrote: > Jeremy, > > can you build your own 3.23.51? There is actually the same memory overwrite > bug in gethostname_r of glibc/Linux in .49a as in .50. Come to think of it, if that's what caused the problem, wouldn't this "solve" it for no

Re: InnoDB crash on 3.23.49a...

2002-05-28 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:59:45PM +0300, Heikki Tuuri wrote: > Jeremy, > > can you build your own 3.23.51? There is actually the same memory > overwrite bug in gethostname_r of glibc/Linux in .49a as in .50. I'll install 3.23.51 tonight. I have been doing daily builds of the 3.23 and 4.0 tree

Re: InnoDB crash on 3.23.49a...

2002-05-28 Thread Heikki Tuuri
Jeremy, can you build your own 3.23.51? There is actually the same memory overwrite bug in gethostname_r of glibc/Linux in .49a as in .50. If you build mysqld yourself you can run it inside gdb and do bt full when it crashes. That might help in tracing the bug. The assertion failure below means