On Saturday 12 January 2002 20:53, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 08:08:51AM -0800, Kyle Hayes wrote:
> > We write our own replication system using our own checkpointing and
> > code. We start with the update logs (we're not happy about the
> > future removal of the update logs b
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 08:08:51AM -0800, Kyle Hayes wrote:
> We write our own replication system using our own checkpointing and
> code. We start with the update logs (we're not happy about the
> future removal of the update logs because of this). I've looked
> through the MySQL source to see
Hi!
Two-way replication is complex, and even more difficult is coping with
broken communications.
MySQL only supports one-way replication (master -> slaves). Auto-inc column
values are communicated in the binlog to the slaves.
Some ideas:
- Generate primary keys where you concatenate the id of
On Thursday 10 January 2002 17:22, Matthew Walker wrote:
> Where I work, we're at the point of needing to maintain two database
> servers, one inhouse, and the other at another physical location. We
> need to replicate between the servers, to keep them both up to date, as
> both will be getting up
