Re: Marketing materials ??

2002-09-19 Thread Brent Baisley
There was a comparison run on eweek.com a few months ago that tested the top databases, including MySQL, using a JDBC interface. Oracle came on top, as you would expect, and it should for the money. MySQL was second, MSSQL was dead last. All were "professionally" tuned as I recall. However, MS

RE: Marketing materials ??

2002-09-19 Thread John Griffin
s to give people a bit of an edge when designing databases ;) John -Original Message- From: Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 5:49 PM To: John Griffin Cc: Yuri; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Marketing materials ?? On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at

Re: Marketing materials ??

2002-09-18 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:15:05AM -0400, John Griffin wrote: > Hi Yuri, > > Money talks. Point out that MySQL is an open source initiative and > can save them money. As for knowing another product, such as MS-SQL, > being a deciding factor; it really isn't an issue. All databases, at > their cor

RE: Marketing materials ??

2002-09-18 Thread John Griffin
Hi Yuri, Money talks. Point out that MySQL is an open source initiative and can save them money. As for knowing another product, such as MS-SQL, being a deciding factor; it really isn't an issue. All databases, at their core functionality, are the same. The same rules of database design apply

Re: Marketing materials ??

2002-09-17 Thread Heikki Tuuri
- Original Message - From: "Yuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: mailing.database.mysql Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 12:37 AM Subject: Marketing materials ?? > Hi, > > I may get in position to protect > my choice of MySQL being confronted > by completely non-technical > manag