On Thursday 10 July 2003 20:38, William R. Mussatto wrote:
> > On Monday 07 July 2003 15:18, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> Konstantin Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > 2x1GHz Intel, 1GB RAM, 40GB WD 7200 8MB cache.
> >> >
> >> > We are going to uprade our server but I'am wondering
> >> > betwee
> On Monday 07 July 2003 15:18, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Konstantin Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > 2x1GHz Intel, 1GB RAM, 40GB WD 7200 8MB cache.
>> >
>> > We are going to uprade our server but I'am wondering
>> > between new Opteron (1.4GHz)and Xeon (2.4).
>>
>> Can't you get a machine for
On Monday 07 July 2003 15:18, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Konstantin Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 2x1GHz Intel, 1GB RAM, 40GB WD 7200 8MB cache.
> >
> > We are going to uprade our server but I'am wondering
> > between new Opteron (1.4GHz)and Xeon (2.4).
>
> Can't you get a machine for testing
Konstantin Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2x1GHz Intel, 1GB RAM, 40GB WD 7200 8MB cache.
> We are going to uprade our server but I'am wondering
> between new Opteron (1.4GHz)and Xeon (2.4).
Can't you get a machine for testing before you buy it? Xeon
processors aren't necessarily a signific
yes i was very impressed with the benchmark on the opteron , frankly i rekon
the opterons are more optimised to a unix environment where xeons are more
optimised for a windoze environment, we just got a dual 2G zeon dell system
for a production box for a project which is doin full text searching on
