Re: Optimization suggestions

2009-12-14 Thread sudhir543-nimavat
. Baroda - 390007 Gujarat, India Personally I'm always ready to learn, although I do not always like being taught From: Gavin Towey To: Sudhir N ; Mysql Sent: Tue, 15 December, 2009 2:16:53 AM Subject: RE: Optimization suggestions Id should probably

RE: Optimization suggestions

2009-12-14 Thread Gavin Towey
Id should probably be an auto_incrementing INT, if you still need a unique text identifier, then I would make a separate field. Though my opinion isn't the only way; there is much debate on natural vs. surrogate keys. I would normalize "folderid" into a lookup in another table, and make folderi

Re: Optimization suggestions

2009-12-14 Thread Jim Lyons
After one very quick look, the index on folderid alone is unnecessary since you have another index in which that field is the high-order field. On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Sudhir N wrote: > I have following table structure, I have to use merge storage engine. > Please have a look, and prov

Re: Optimization suggestions when only using Innodb

2005-12-01 Thread Kayra Otaner
Please see my comments below : On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 14:06 -0600, Ross Anderson wrote: > I have read the suggestions for optimization for innodb however I'm > curious if anyone can help me understand which buffers are common (thus > used by innodb action) and which are specific to myiasm. The s