Re: Querying on subsets of one-to-many and many-to-many

2004-10-27 Thread Daniel BODEA
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 6:41 PM Subject: Re: Querying on subsets of one-to-many and many-to-many > OK, now that I have a better model to work with, let me try again. (And > stop being so discouraged! This is hard for everyone until they get the >

Re: Querying on subsets of one-to-many and many-to-many

2004-10-26 Thread SGreen
isputable of course) impossibility > of this thing using one trip only. > > Daniel > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Daniel BODEA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 200

Re: Querying on subsets of one-to-many and many-to-many

2004-10-26 Thread Daniel BODEA
to myself the (disputable of course) impossibility of this thing using one trip only. Daniel - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Daniel BODEA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 3:41 PM Subject: Re: Query

Re: Querying on subsets of one-to-many and many-to-many

2004-10-26 Thread SGreen
Under most circumstances, even with data tables as large as yours, I have found that direct JOIN statements have provided acceptable performance. On certain highly normalized databases, where the requirements of the query needed more than 4 or 5 tables joined at once, I have also used your "cac