-Original Message-
From: Claudio Nanni [mailto:claudio.na...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 2:44 AM
To: Simon J Mudd
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: R: Re: Replication, Stored Proceedures and Databases
You dont have changes coming from db G since it is ignored from
Dear ALL:
Some time the slave would crushed by I/O error.It happen at the server with the lower
CPU.( per 45 days )
All of the slave database has block the binary log,it reduce the CPU loading.
The database would replicate text,int,varchar but no blob.
Network connection hasn't drop
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 10:19, Kirill Peskov (WEB-EU) wrote:
Looks like we've mixed up two threads into one ;-)
As I understood from various forums and maillists, versions 4.x are
still in development state.
Yup, 4.0.X is gamma.
The newest production version is 3.23.55,
am I
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 16:36, Floyd Wellershaus wrote:
Egor,
I am sorry, my bad. I misrepresented the versions of mysql I am using. Must
have been a typo.
Here is what I am using.
Master: Sparc Solaris 7 MySQL 4.0.9-gamma-log
Slave: RedHat Linux 7.2 MySQL 4.0.8-gamma-log.
On Wednesday 18 December 2002 17:18, you wrote:
At 16:57 18-12-02 +0200, you wrote:
On Wednesday 18 December 2002 11:36, Wico de Leeuw wrote:
I've setup replication with a master-slave.
But i only want to replicate some databases so i'd put in my.cnf on the
slave (it's being used,
, 2002 10:37 PM
Subject: re: Re: Re: Replication
CP,
Monday, September 30, 2002, 3:48:31 AM, you wrote:
C The Master's server id is 1 while the slave's server id was set to 5.
There
C is no problem for the slave to establish connection to the master.
However,
C the slave complains that error
CP,
Tuesday, October 01, 2002, 11:29:30 AM, you wrote:
C I stopped both mysql in master and slave. Then I put in the server id for
C both master and slave, start the master then the slave. Is it okay?
Yes.
--
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This
CP,
Monday, September 30, 2002, 3:48:31 AM, you wrote:
C The Master's server id is 1 while the slave's server id was set to 5. There
C is no problem for the slave to establish connection to the master. However,
C the slave complains that error reading packet from server, the reason is
C
and this messages keep on
repeating.
Any idea?
Thanks,
Chee Peng
- Original Message -
From: Victoria Reznichenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Replication
Hello CP,
Friday, September 27, 2002, 3:11:14 AM, you wrote:
C hi Victoria
Hello CP,
Friday, September 27, 2002, 3:11:14 AM, you wrote:
C hi Victoria, thanks for the reply. I have set server id in the very
C beginning, but its still not working. I don't understand why the MySQL would
C not let me change its server id accordingly. The server id was set to 1.
You must
Hello,
I also plan to use two servers such that each is a master for the other.
A - B
B - A
Unless you tell me otherwise, the log-server-updates option
will not be used.
Seems to work in a small test I've conducted.
In fact this setup will be used for reasons of high availability.
(rather
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 12:44:46PM +0200, Claudio Cicali wrote:
[snip]
Here, seems that are the slaves that pop data from master.
So where is the truth ? Is the master that pushes or the slaves the pops ?
Or it is a combination of the two ?
In normal operation, the master pushes to the slave.
No, this isn't spam. I was publicly thanking someone for advice given. :/
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 08:25:37PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your message cannot be posted because it appears to be either spam or
simply off topic to our filter. To bypass the filter you must include
one of the
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 03:29:37PM +0900, wrote:
It sounds like you are using a version of MySQL that had a
replication bug in it. I suspect that if you upgrade to 3.23.33 the
problem will go away.
No, Master is 3.23.33, and slave is 3.23.32
3.23.32 was troublesome for slaves.
Here
Does this problem exist in 3.23.32??
Thanks for the bug report. The problem is a bug in the code that skips events
when it sees a log entry with the same server id - something that can only
happen in the bi-directional replicaiton setup. Fix:
--- 1.85/sql/slave.cc Sat Jan 27 15:33:30
On Thursday 15 February 2001 18:50, Rodolfo Sikora wrote:
Does this problem exist in 3.23.32??
Thanks for the bug report. The problem is a bug in the code that skips
events
when it sees a log entry with the same server id - something that can only
happen in the bi-directional replicaiton
16 matches
Mail list logo
