Re: Re: Replication Bug in 3.23.33

2001-02-15 Thread Sasha Pachev
On Thursday 15 February 2001 18:50, Rodolfo Sikora wrote: >Does this problem exist in 3.23.32?? > > > >> >>Thanks for the bug report. The problem is a bug in the code that skips events >>when it sees a log entry with the same server id - something that can only >>happen in the bi-directional re

Re: Re: Replication Bug in 3.23.33

2001-02-15 Thread Rodolfo Sikora
Does this problem exist in 3.23.32?? > >Thanks for the bug report. The problem is a bug in the code that skips events >when it sees a log entry with the same server id - something that can only >happen in the bi-directional replicaiton setup. Fix: > >--- 1.85/sql/slave.cc Sat Jan 27 15:33:

Re: Replication Bug in 3.23.33

2001-02-14 Thread Sasha Pachev
On Wednesday 14 February 2001 12:58, Matt Hahnfeld wrote: >Wow, that was fast! Thanks!! We mean what we say - the better the bug report, the quicker the fix :-) > >--Matt > >On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Sasha Pachev wrote: > >> On Wednesday 14 February 2001 09:19, Matt Hahnfeld wrote: >> >After do

Re: Replication Bug in 3.23.33

2001-02-14 Thread Sasha Pachev
On Wednesday 14 February 2001 09:19, Matt Hahnfeld wrote: >After downgrading to 3.23.30, replication worked fine without the problem >posted below. This appears to be a bug in the newest version (3.23.33) >only. > >The failed tests were run under mysql-3.23.33-pc-linux-gnu-i686 (binary >distribut