On Thursday 15 February 2001 18:50, Rodolfo Sikora wrote:
>Does this problem exist in 3.23.32??
>
>
>
>>
>>Thanks for the bug report. The problem is a bug in the code that skips
events
>>when it sees a log entry with the same server id - something that can only
>>happen in the bi-directional re
Does this problem exist in 3.23.32??
>
>Thanks for the bug report. The problem is a bug in the code that skips events
>when it sees a log entry with the same server id - something that can only
>happen in the bi-directional replicaiton setup. Fix:
>
>--- 1.85/sql/slave.cc Sat Jan 27 15:33:
On Wednesday 14 February 2001 12:58, Matt Hahnfeld wrote:
>Wow, that was fast! Thanks!!
We mean what we say - the better the bug report, the quicker the fix :-)
>
>--Matt
>
>On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Sasha Pachev wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 14 February 2001 09:19, Matt Hahnfeld wrote:
>> >After do
On Wednesday 14 February 2001 09:19, Matt Hahnfeld wrote:
>After downgrading to 3.23.30, replication worked fine without the problem
>posted below. This appears to be a bug in the newest version (3.23.33)
>only.
>
>The failed tests were run under mysql-3.23.33-pc-linux-gnu-i686 (binary
>distribut