Hi!
> "Sinisa" == Sinisa Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sinisa> Jeremy Zawodny writes:
>>
>> Monty recently proposed some changes to MySQL's client/server protocol
>> which will enable "real" prepared statements. So I'd guess it'll
>> happen somewhere in the 4.x tree.
>>
>> > Al
Jeremy Zawodny writes:
>
> Monty recently proposed some changes to MySQL's client/server protocol
> which will enable "real" prepared statements. So I'd guess it'll
> happen somewhere in the 4.x tree.
>
> > Also just out of curiousity, how much of a performance hit does
> > mysql take in compil
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 07:40:18PM +0100, Mark Maunder wrote:
> Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
>
> > > so the database server can reuse the old execution plan. Let me
> > > know if you want a example.
> >
> > That's true for some database servers but not MySQL (yet).
>
> I wasn't aware of that - thanks J
Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 05:02:22PM +0100, Mark Maunder wrote:
> >
> > The only time you'll see a real performance increase is where you're
> > repeadedly calling execute() on the same statement handle with
> > different values for the placeholders - usually this occurs in
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 05:02:22PM +0100, Mark Maunder wrote:
>
> The only time you'll see a real performance increase is where you're
> repeadedly calling execute() on the same statement handle with
> different values for the placeholders - usually this occurs in a
> loop. This will save you havi
Scott Alexander wrote:
> I've been reading a document at
> http://www.saturn5.com/~jwb/dbi-performance.html
> by Jeffrey William Baker.
>
> And I have changed my perl code in one script to use placeholders and
> bound parameters.
>
> On my test server 500 mhz rh 7.1 128 MB I haven't noticed any s
