According to
http://dimitrik.free.fr/blog/archives/2010/12/mysql-performance-analyzing-perconas-tpcclike-workload-on-mysql-55.html
the xtraDB is ignoring the io capacity setting.
But this of course it might be just a minor bug in the percona version
that dimitriK used in his test..:-)
akops
On 1
Hi,
> Also after reading Dimitrik blog
> (http://dimitrik.free.fr/blog/archives/2010/07/mysql-performance-innodb-io-capacity-flushing.html),
> its seems to me , than one of the thing that are different between the
> stock mysql (5.5) and xtradb, is the way that they handle IO capacity
> and flush.
According to the benchmarks on the Personal website, the 5.1 version of
Persona has the same about performance as mysql 5.5
(http://www.percona.com/software/benchmarks/)
Also the 5.5 version of the Persona(not reported as stable) is even
better than mysql 5.5 according the the same site.
Also aft
On 2011-02-14 15:43, Singer X.J. Wang wrote:
So I'm assuming OLTP type transaction, then I'm going to recommend
MySQL 5.5.
Why is that flavor to be chosen over MariaDB with XtraDB or Percona with
XtraDB?
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubsc
On 2011-02-14 15:31, Singer X.J. Wang wrote:
What is your load type?
Heavy read but enough write not to benefit much from query cache. It is
a webshop app (custom).
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?u
