On 3/27/07, Tim Lucia wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Maciej Dobrzanski
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 6:46 AM
> To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
> Subject: Re: Why doesn't the InnoDB count() match table status?
>
> MyISAM and InnoDB (and there are plenty mor
> -Original Message-
> From: Maciej Dobrzanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 6:46 AM
> To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
> Subject: Re: Why doesn't the InnoDB count() match table status?
>
> MyISAM and InnoDB (and there are plenty mor
In news:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Daevid Vincent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because we're a huge enterprise product, with 3 databases of > 200
> tables each.
>
> We are migrating from MYISM to INNODB and keeping track of that value
> isn't something we thought we'd need to do. Plus it seems like
> so
Hi Daevid,
Ugh. How about not going berserk on the public mailing list?
We can understand that you're upset that you didn't read the manual
before starting a MyISAM to InnoDB conversion. You didn't do your
research and now you're being hit by a very simple (and not really all
that unexpecte
On Mon, March 26, 2007 16:21, Daevid Vincent said:
>> You're about 5 years too late for this converation, but I recall it
>
> Really? People have just happily accepted this absurd limitation for
> _five_
> years? Wow.
>
>> having to do with the fact that when you're on a table that supports
>> tran
> You're about 5 years too late for this converation, but I recall it
Really? People have just happily accepted this absurd limitation for _five_
years? Wow.
> having to do with the fact that when you're on a table that supports
> transactions, you don't know exactly how many records a particular
> > Is mySQL planning on fixing this BUG. YES -- it is a BUG. A
> BIG FAT HARRY
> > ONE.
> >
>
> I think you mean 'hairy', not 'harry'. There are no 'harry'
> bugs, apart
LOL! Doh! Yeah. I was so blinded by rage that I forgot my spelling.
> > It's completely stupid that I can't query and
Daevid Vincent wrote:
Is mySQL planning on fixing this BUG. YES -- it is a BUG. A BIG FAT HARRY
ONE.
I think you mean 'hairy', not 'harry'. There are no 'harry' bugs, apart
from that British fool who's in line for the throne.
It's completely stupid that I can't query and get an accurat
In the last episode (Mar 26), Daevid Vincent said:
> > In the last episode (Mar 26), Daevid Vincent said:
> > > Aside from the incredibly annoying fact that InnoDB tables don't
> > > store a total COUNT(), my question is... Why are these numbers
> > > different? I could easily parse out the second
> In the last episode (Mar 26), Daevid Vincent said:
> > Aside from the incredibly annoying fact that InnoDB tables
> don't store a
> > total COUNT(), my question is... Why are these numbers
> different? I could
> > easily parse out the second query which is REDICULOUSLY
> faster. BTW, why
> > d
In the last episode (Mar 26), Daevid Vincent said:
> Aside from the incredibly annoying fact that InnoDB tables don't store a
> total COUNT(), my question is... Why are these numbers different? I could
> easily parse out the second query which is REDICULOUSLY faster. BTW, why
> doesn't mySQL just '
11 matches
Mail list logo
