Re: avg and timestamp/datetime

2005-04-12 Thread SGreen
I think that's because those databases render datetime values into their "seconds from epoch" values (whichever epoch they use) when casting to a numeric type (I know MS SQL does. I assume the others do, too.) It seems that MySQL is the oddball on this issue. Shawn Green Database Administrator

Re: avg and timestamp/datetime

2005-04-12 Thread James Nobis
Thanks for the detailed explanation which is what I assumed was happening. Does it make any sense though? Shouldn't we get some sort of warning for the implicit cast? I could be wrong but I thought PostgreSQL, Oracle, and SQL server handled avg(date/time values) correctly. Quoting [EMAIL PROTE

Re: avg and timestamp/datetime

2005-04-12 Thread SGreen
James Nobis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/12/2005 10:19:33 AM: > Hi all, > > Essentially I was asked to look into a problem with a query at the > office which > used AVG on a datetime column which produces incorrect results. (MySQL 4.1.10 > on RHEL 3 update 4) As you can see below the star