Re: update and times

2010-10-07 Thread Simcha Younger
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 17:48:55 -0400 kalin m ka...@el.net wrote: Simcha Younger wrote: executing this query didn't update the record. why? The two values you have here are equal: sample data : 12862162510269684 query: where unix_time 12862162510269684

Re: update and times

2010-10-06 Thread kalin m
Simcha Younger wrote: On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:11:08 -0400 kalin m ka...@el.net wrote: what i'm trying to do is update the column only of one of those times isn't yet passed. and it works. except sometimes... like these 2 unix times: this was in the table under unix time:

Re: update and times

2010-10-05 Thread Simcha Younger
On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:11:08 -0400 kalin m ka...@el.net wrote: what i'm trying to do is update the column only of one of those times isn't yet passed. and it works. except sometimes... like these 2 unix times: this was in the table under unix time: 12862162385941345... this

RE: update and times

2010-10-04 Thread Gavin Towey
Those unix_time values don't seem to correspond to the dates you have. select NOW(), UNIX_TIMESTAMP(NOW()); +-+---+ | NOW() | UNIX_TIMESTAMP(NOW()) | +-+---+ | 2010-10-04 13:18:08 |1286223488

Re: update and times

2010-10-04 Thread kalin m
right the unix times in the example table were just that - examples from a few days ago... the example with the query was a 'real one' something that happened today... it's a 64 bit machine. the unix times are stored in a bigint column. the times in the column and the update