At 12:09 +0400 9/10/02, Artem V. Ryabov wrote:
>Hello Victoria,
>
> As far as I see bug of muliple log files still not fixed regardless
> of last change in 4.0.4:
> 'FLUSH LOGS removed numerical extension for all future update logs.'
This bugfix affects the update log, not the binary update
Hello Victoria,
As far as I see bug of muliple log files still not fixed regardless
of last change in 4.0.4:
'FLUSH LOGS removed numerical extension for all future update logs.'
--
Best regards,
Artem mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sql query
Artem,
Monday, September 02, 2002, 12:44:30 PM, you wrote:
AVR> Thursday, August 15, 2002, you wrote:
AVR>>> In case of repliacation circle (A->B->A) query 'flush log' on any of
AVR>>> this servers create endless loop, with creating new binary log file
AVR>>> on each iteration. (about 30 ne
Hello Victoria,
Thursday, August 15, 2002, you wrote:
AVR>> In case of repliacation circle (A->B->A) query 'flush log' on any of
AVR>> this servers create endless loop, with creating new binary log file
AVR>> on each iteration. (about 30 new files every second in my case)
> Thanks for bug r
Artem,
Thursday, August 15, 2002, 12:06:07 PM, you wrote:
AVR> In case of repliacation circle (A->B->A) query 'flush log' on any of
AVR> this servers create endless loop, with creating new binary log file
AVR> on each iteration. (about 30 new files every second in my case)
Thanks for bug r
Hello mysql,
In case of repliacation circle (A->B->A) query 'flush log' on any of
this servers create endless loop, with creating new binary log file
on each iteration. (about 30 new files every second in my case)
--
Best regards,
Artem mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all,
I was check up 4.0.3 (from the Development Source Tree), bug still exist.
>>Description:
aor> I use replication circle (A->B, B->A) with 3.23.51 - all ok.
aor> But I got problem, when upgrade both my servers to 4.0.2.
aor> Mysqld create
>Description:
I use replication circle (A->B, B->A) with 3.23.51 - all ok.
But I got problem, when upgrade both my servers to 4.0.2.
Mysqld create 30 new bin-log files every second at both servers:
---
[www2:/opt/mysql-dev/var]:13
Hello,
I also plan to use two servers such that each is a master for the other.
A -> B
B -> A
Unless you tell me otherwise, the log-server-updates option
will not be used.
Seems to work in a small test I've conducted.
In fact this setup will be used for reasons of high availability.
(rather t
Bhavin,
> Is there a way to have DB-A and DB-B such that DB-A is the master and DB-B
Can't help you with the replication question - but here is a replication
answer - have everyone in your installation repeat after me: "the DBA is
your master"! (and say it again...and again...)
=dn
List fodder
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 10:35:06PM -0700, Bhavin Vyas wrote:
> Is there a way to have DB-A and DB-B such that DB-A is the master and DB-B
> is the slave. However, I also want to make DB-B the master and DB-A it's
> slave so that if I have to fail over to DB-B then DB-A is automatically
> followin
* Bhavin Vyas
> Is there a way to have DB-A and DB-B such that DB-A is the master and DB-B
> is the slave. However, I also want to make DB-B the master and DB-A it's
> slave so that if I have to fail over to DB-B then DB-A is automatically
> following the changes. It doesn't seem probable that thi
No can do. Replication is one-way.
You can, however, have multiple Slaves.
- Original Message -
From: "Bhavin Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:35 AM
Subject: Replication Circle
Hello,
Is there a way to have DB-A
Hello,
Is there a way to have DB-A and DB-B such that DB-A is the master and DB-B
is the slave. However, I also want to make DB-B the master and DB-A it's
slave so that if I have to fail over to DB-B then DB-A is automatically
following the changes. It doesn't seem probable that this is possible,
14 matches
Mail list logo
