Hello Victoria,
As far as I see bug of muliple log files still not fixed regardless
of last change in 4.0.4:
'FLUSH LOGS removed numerical extension for all future update logs.'
--
Best regards,
Artem mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sql query
At 12:09 +0400 9/10/02, Artem V. Ryabov wrote:
Hello Victoria,
As far as I see bug of muliple log files still not fixed regardless
of last change in 4.0.4:
'FLUSH LOGS removed numerical extension for all future update logs.'
This bugfix affects the update log, not the binary update
Hello Victoria,
Thursday, August 15, 2002, you wrote:
AVR In case of repliacation circle (A-B-A) query 'flush log' on any of
AVR this servers create endless loop, with creating new binary log file
AVR on each iteration. (about 30 new files every second in my case)
Thanks for bug report!
Artem,
Monday, September 02, 2002, 12:44:30 PM, you wrote:
AVR Thursday, August 15, 2002, you wrote:
AVR In case of repliacation circle (A-B-A) query 'flush log' on any of
AVR this servers create endless loop, with creating new binary log file
AVR on each iteration. (about 30 new files
Hello mysql,
In case of repliacation circle (A-B-A) query 'flush log' on any of
this servers create endless loop, with creating new binary log file
on each iteration. (about 30 new files every second in my case)
--
Best regards,
Artem mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Artem,
Thursday, August 15, 2002, 12:06:07 PM, you wrote:
AVR In case of repliacation circle (A-B-A) query 'flush log' on any of
AVR this servers create endless loop, with creating new binary log file
AVR on each iteration. (about 30 new files every second in my case)
Thanks for bug
Hello all,
I was check up 4.0.3 (from the Development Source Tree), bug still exist.
Description:
aor I use replication circle (A-B, B-A) with 3.23.51 - all ok.
aor But I got problem, when upgrade both my servers to 4.0.2.
aor Mysqld create 30 new bin-log files every
Description:
I use replication circle (A-B, B-A) with 3.23.51 - all ok.
But I got problem, when upgrade both my servers to 4.0.2.
Mysqld create 30 new bin-log files every second at both servers:
---
[www2:/opt/mysql-dev/var]:1303# ls -1 www2
Hello,
I also plan to use two servers such that each is a master for the other.
A - B
B - A
Unless you tell me otherwise, the log-server-updates option
will not be used.
Seems to work in a small test I've conducted.
In fact this setup will be used for reasons of high availability.
(rather
No can do. Replication is one-way.
You can, however, have multiple Slaves.
- Original Message -
From: Bhavin Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:35 AM
Subject: Replication Circle
Hello,
Is there a way to have DB-A and DB-B such that DB
* Bhavin Vyas
Is there a way to have DB-A and DB-B such that DB-A is the master and DB-B
is the slave. However, I also want to make DB-B the master and DB-A it's
slave so that if I have to fail over to DB-B then DB-A is automatically
following the changes. It doesn't seem probable that this
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 10:35:06PM -0700, Bhavin Vyas wrote:
Is there a way to have DB-A and DB-B such that DB-A is the master and DB-B
is the slave. However, I also want to make DB-B the master and DB-A it's
slave so that if I have to fail over to DB-B then DB-A is automatically
following
Bhavin,
Is there a way to have DB-A and DB-B such that DB-A is the master and DB-B
Can't help you with the replication question - but here is a replication
answer - have everyone in your installation repeat after me: the DBA is
your master! (and say it again...and again...)
=dn
List fodder:
Hello,
Is there a way to have DB-A and DB-B such that DB-A is the master and DB-B
is the slave. However, I also want to make DB-B the master and DB-A it's
slave so that if I have to fail over to DB-B then DB-A is automatically
following the changes. It doesn't seem probable that this is possible,
14 matches
Mail list logo
