Re: Patching w/o the compiler was Re: Replication time patch

2001-02-26 Thread William R. Mussatto
43:13 -0500 > From: Thimble Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "William R. Mussatto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Patching w/o the compiler was Re: Replication time patch > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 03:35:06PM -0

Re: Patching w/o the compiler was Re: Replication time patch

2001-02-26 Thread Thimble Smith
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 03:35:06PM -0800, William R. Mussatto wrote: > Your reply triggered a question? > > If you are on a win32 box and using the binary builds, what is the > proceure for getting these patchs? Last time I checked the site is was > still showing 3.23.33 as the current release

Patching w/o the compiler was Re: Replication time patch

2001-02-23 Thread William R. Mussatto
Your reply triggered a question? If you are on a win32 box and using the binary builds, what is the proceure for getting these patchs? Last time I checked the site is was still showing 3.23.33 as the current release? On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Sasha Pachev wrote: ... > Just realized that a while

Replication time patch

2001-02-23 Thread Sasha Pachev
Just realized that a while ago, I fixed a bug in 3.23.33 with time replication, and forgot to post the fix to the public lists - just sent it to the user who reported the bug: --- 1.86/sql/slave.cc Wed Feb 14 12:51:49 2001 +++ 1.87/sql/slave.cc Wed Feb 14 21:23:20 2001 @@ -857,7 +857,8 @@