43:13 -0500
> From: Thimble Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "William R. Mussatto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Patching w/o the compiler was Re: Replication time patch
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 03:35:06PM -0
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 03:35:06PM -0800, William R. Mussatto wrote:
> Your reply triggered a question?
>
> If you are on a win32 box and using the binary builds, what is the
> proceure for getting these patchs? Last time I checked the site is was
> still showing 3.23.33 as the current release
Your reply triggered a question?
If you are on a win32 box and using the binary builds, what is the
proceure for getting these patchs? Last time I checked the site is was
still showing 3.23.33 as the current release?
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Sasha Pachev wrote:
...
> Just realized that a while
Just realized that a while ago, I fixed a bug in 3.23.33 with time
replication, and forgot to post the fix to the public lists - just sent it to
the user who reported the bug:
--- 1.86/sql/slave.cc Wed Feb 14 12:51:49 2001
+++ 1.87/sql/slave.cc Wed Feb 14 21:23:20 2001
@@ -857,7 +857,8 @@