schizophrenic
Hi Rob,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:47 AM, Rob Wultsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:39 AM, Morten Primdahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Rob and Baron, I'd never heard of the integers table approach
before, really good stuff!
If memory serves
Hi,
A user enters a date range (ie. 2 dates, '2008-04-01' and
'2008-04-03'), the problem is to determine how many open events exist
on each day in this interval.
Assume that the events table has a start_date and an end_date.
One way to solve this problem, is to create an inline view in the
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Morten Primdahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
A user enters a date range (ie. 2 dates, '2008-04-01' and
'2008-04-03'), the problem is to determine how many open events exist
on each day in this interval.
Assume that the events table has a
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:42 AM, Morten Primdahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
A user enters a date range (ie. 2 dates, '2008-04-01' and
'2008-04-03'), the problem is to determine how many open events exist
on each day in this interval.
Assume that the events table has a start_date and
Baron Schwartz schrieb:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Morten Primdahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
A user enters a date range (ie. 2 dates, '2008-04-01' and
'2008-04-03'), the problem is to determine how many open events exist
on each day in this interval.
Assume that the events
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Sebastian Mendel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Baron Schwartz schrieb:
SQL magic
i knew that you would answer this ... ;-)
And he did it a minute or so faster than me... (though I did rip off
his integers table way back when)
--
Rob Wultsch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Rob and Baron, I'd never heard of the integers table approach
before, really good stuff!
First off your porting over or dealing with formerly oracle code,
right?
Nah, I just learned SQL on Oracle back in the day. DUAL works under
MySQL also - don't know since what revision, but
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:39 AM, Morten Primdahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Rob and Baron, I'd never heard of the integers table approach
before, really good stuff!
If memory serves postgres has something similar built in, so the
syntax is something like
seq(1..100) or something like
