Christian Reichenbach wrote:
You've a very radical position.
Not really; I don't find it at all radical to think in terms of
'reasonability'. The poster in question believes that adding a feature
to make square brackets work like quotation marks would make the code
base harder to maintain a
>From: Christian Reichenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
We encountered that MySQL (or MyODBC) uses different
quoting characters for legal names and strings.
>>>BSJ> Well, let's put it this way : tables names between
>>>BSJ> square brackets only exists in Microsoft!
>>>That might be right, but th
Hi Jan,
>>>We encountered that MySQL (or MyODBC) uses different
>>>quoting characters for legal names and strings.
>>BSJ> Well, let's put it this way : tables names between
>>BSJ> square brackets only exists in Microsoft!
>>That might be right, but this is how Microsoft works.
JS> I'm sorry, but
>>We encountered that MySQL (or MyODBC) uses different
>>quoting characters for legal names and strings. At present we
>>are using square brackets for names (like [my table], [my column] or
>>[my table].[my column]) and inverted commas for strings
>>(like mytxt = 'text').
>>
>>Is there an option fo
A few months ago I tried to use MySQL as an alternative database
backend for our software product. Currently we are using MS Access and
MS SQL Server.
We encountered that MySQL (or MyODBC) uses different quoting
characters for legal names and strings. At present we are using square
brackets for na
