ROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 10 June, 2003 05:42
Subject: Re: Storing negative numbers in AUTO_INCREMENT
>I hate to be the one to ask, but what's the subject have to do with the
>rest of
>the message? I can't see how the two are related at all.
They are not
"rich johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Short question: I understand that MySQL in some circumstances
> may decide that it's faster to do a full table scan rather than use
> the index to look up values.
>
> But I miss some information on *when* this happens. Is there some
> way, short of re
t the
list once again with a "sorry, wrong subject" though...
- Rich
Edward Dudlik
Becoming Digital
www.becomingdigital.com
- Original Message -
From: "rich johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 10 June, 2003 04:57
Subject: Storin
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 10 June, 2003 04:57
Subject: Storing negative numbers in AUTO_INCREMENT
Hi,
Short question: I understand that MySQL in some circumstances
may decide that it's faster to do a full table scan rather than use
the index to look up values.
But I miss some i
Hi,
Short question: I understand that MySQL in some circumstances
may decide that it's faster to do a full table scan rather than use
the index to look up values.
But I miss some information on *when* this happens. Is there some
way, short of reading the source code, that one can get some more
det
