- Original Message -
From: Daevid Vincent dae...@daevid.com
d.`date_release`!='-00-00' AND sd.`scene_id`=s.`scene_id` GROUP
BY sg.`scene_id` ORDER BY num DESC, sd.`count_dl_monthly` DESC LIMIT 30;
Could you put an index on sg.scene_id? Not sure, but it might help the grouping
be
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Daevid Vincent dae...@daevid.com wrote:
Anyone have any thoughts on how I might optimize this query?
As always, it's all about the indexes. The index it chose on your
main table looks pretty weak. You probably should move those
non-joining columns out of your
-- --- -- --
-- --
--- - --
--
1 SIMPLE d ref
PRIMARY,date_release,STATUS,status_release,dvd_release status_release 1
const2436 USING WHERE; USING TEMPORARY; USING
filesort
1 SIMPLE s ref PRIMARY,dvd_id_2,dvd_id
dvd_id 4
: status_release
key_len: 1
ref: const
rows: 1976
Extra: Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort
*** 2. row ***
id: 1
select_type: SIMPLE
table: s
type: ref
possible_keys: dvd_id_2,dvd_id
s 2011/05/27 12:26 -0700, Daevid Vincent
[a] the EXTENDED keyword doesn't seem to do anything different? I get the
same columns and results??!
show warnings
2011/05/27 12:26 -0700, Daevid Vincent
In other words, am I wasting my time trying to tweak my
query and indexes here with the idea
I sent this Friday, but it never made it to the list?!
-Original Message-
From: Daevid Vincent [mailto:dae...@daevid.com]
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 12:27 PM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort
I'm trying to optimize a query that doesn't seem
-
On 5/31/2011 1:27 PM, Daevid Vincent wrote:
I sent this Friday, but it never made it to the list?!
-Original Message-
From: Daevid Vincent [mailto:dae...@daevid.com]
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 12:27 PM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort
