Hi!
On Mar 02, Thomas Spahni wrote:
> Hi Sergei,
>
> I have used FT search on a collection of ~ 38'000 documents totalling 550
> MB of data since 4.0.2. To my observation people have a strong tendence to
> search for a few words they expect to be found close together in the text.
>
> As far as t
Hi Sergei,
I have used FT search on a collection of ~ 38'000 documents totalling 550
MB of data since 4.0.2. To my observation people have a strong tendence to
search for a few words they expect to be found close together in the text.
As far as this is technically possible it would be helpful to
Hi!
On Feb 26, leegold wrote:
> Is there any way to make relevance when using boolean mode more useful?
> If not, are there plans in the future Fulltext development "todo" for
> making it useful?
Current relevance formula is described in internals.texi (see mysqldoc
repository on mysql.bkbits.net
Is there any way to make relevance when using boolean mode more useful?
If not, are there plans in the future Fulltext development "todo" for
making it useful?
I'm thinking of just counting the keyword occurences in records with a
PHP script somehow and using that to order the records. Or doing a
