On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 16:35:08 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 02:59 PM 9/1/2006, you wrote:
mos wrote:
AMD Athlon 64X2 3800+ Dual Core S939 Manchester (2x512K cache)
AMD Athlon 64X2 4200+ Dual Core S939 Manchester (2x512k cache)
AMD Athlon 64X2 4400+ Dual Core S939 Toledo (2x1MB cache)
AMD
I use the 4400+. The 1meg cache makes a difference.
Larry
- Original Message -
From: mos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 11:29 AM
Subject: Which AMD Dual Core Processor?
I'm thinking of upgrading my AMD3500 to a dual core AMD processor
I'm thinking of upgrading my AMD3500 to a dual core AMD processor.
Is there any noticeable difference between these?
AMD Athlon 64X2 3800+ Dual Core S939 Manchester (2x512K cache)
AMD Athlon 64X2 4200+ Dual Core S939 Manchester (2x512k cache)
AMD Athlon 64X2 4400+ Dual Core S939 Toledo (2x1MB
mos wrote:
AMD Athlon 64X2 3800+ Dual Core S939 Manchester (2x512K cache)
AMD Athlon 64X2 4200+ Dual Core S939 Manchester (2x512k cache)
AMD Athlon 64X2 4400+ Dual Core S939 Toledo (2x1MB cache)
AMD Athlon 64X2 4600+ Dual Core S939 Manchester (2x512k cache)
I would think, as a blind guess,
At 02:59 PM 9/1/2006, you wrote:
mos wrote:
AMD Athlon 64X2 3800+ Dual Core S939 Manchester (2x512K cache)
AMD Athlon 64X2 4200+ Dual Core S939 Manchester (2x512k cache)
AMD Athlon 64X2 4400+ Dual Core S939 Toledo (2x1MB cache)
AMD Athlon 64X2 4600+ Dual Core S939 Manchester (2x512k cache)
I
mos wrote:
I'm thinking of upgrading my AMD3500 to a dual core AMD processor.
Is there any noticeable difference between these?
AMD Athlon 64X2 3800+ Dual Core S939 Manchester (2x512K cache)
AMD Athlon 64X2 4200+ Dual Core S939 Manchester (2x512k cache)
AMD Athlon 64X2 4400+ Dual Core S939