Re: Why release 5.0.23 instead of 5.0.24?

2006-07-31 Thread Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
- Original Message From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Cc: Jim Winstead ; mysql@lists.mysql.com Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 5:54:31 AM Subject: Re: Why release 5.0.23 instead of 5.0.24? On Saturday, 29 July 2006 at 9:53:29 -0700, Abdullah Ib

Re: Why release 5.0.23 instead of 5.0.24?

2006-07-30 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Saturday, 29 July 2006 at 9:53:29 -0700, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > Jim Winstead wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 08:35:41AM -0700, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: >>> Why MySQL 5.0.23 while it has serious bug? >>> >>> I thought you guys will release 5.0.24 instead. >> >> This is

Re: Why release 5.0.23 instead of 5.0.24?

2006-07-29 Thread Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
That's why I wondered. So when will we get MySQL 5.0.25 for FreeBSD? -A On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 08:35:41AM -0700, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > Why MySQL 5.0.23 while it has serious bug? > > I thought you guys will release 5.0.24 instead. This is still the case. 5.0.23 will not be rel

Re: Why release 5.0.23 instead of 5.0.24?

2006-07-29 Thread Jim Winstead
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 08:35:41AM -0700, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > Why MySQL 5.0.23 while it has serious bug? > > I thought you guys will release 5.0.24 instead. This is still the case. 5.0.23 will not be released, and 5.0.24 will be released as soon as it is ready. (I see that some

Why release 5.0.23 instead of 5.0.24?

2006-07-29 Thread Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
Hello, Why MySQL 5.0.23 while it has serious bug? I thought you guys will release 5.0.24 instead. Security fix: If a user has access to MyISAM table t, that user can create a MERGE table m that accesses t. However, if the user's privileges on t are subsequently revoked, the user can continu