really really a little noisy.
这下犯众怒了吧，招人烦了~ 囧
Best regards,
Sharl.Jimh.Tsin (From China **Obviously Taiwan INCLUDED**)
2010/12/29 杨涛涛 :
> Ok, I'll not post any more! Just reading!
>
>
> David Yeung, In China, Beijing.
> My First Blog:http://yueliangdao0608.cublog.cn
> My Second Blog:http://yu
Ok, I'll not post any more! Just reading!
David Yeung, In China, Beijing.
My First Blog:http://yueliangdao0608.cublog.cn
My Second Blog:http://yueliangdao0608.blog.51cto.com
My Msn: yueliangdao0...@gmail.com
在 2010年12月23日 下午8:14，Johan De Meersman 写道：
> Glad to hear I'm not the only one annoy
Glad to hear I'm not the only one annoyed :-) I've plonked him in the
meantime.
2010/12/23 Jorg W Young
>
> This guy has been saying nothing meaningful on this list, but
> advertise his blog everywhere.
> Just be shame. He should be kicked out from the list.
>
> Jorg.
>
> 2010/12/23 杨涛涛 :
> > Th
This guy has been saying nothing meaningful on this list, but
advertise his blog everywhere.
Just be shame. He should be kicked out from the list.
Jorg.
2010/12/23 杨涛涛 :
> This way is very well, but it has to do lots of human work.
> David Yeung, In China, Beijing.
> My First Blog:http://yuelian
)
> AIM & Skype : RolandoLogicWorx
> redwa...@logicworks.net
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/rolandoedwards
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Machiel Richards [mailto:machi...@rdc.co.za]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 7:20 AM
> To: mysql mailing list
> Subjec
inal Message-
From: Rolando Edwards [mailto:redwa...@logicworks.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 6:53 AM
To: Machiel Richards; mysql mailing list
Subject: RE: Another replication question
MySQL, by design, cannot do that.
A DB Server can be Master to Multiple Slaves
Think of the CHANGE
chiel Richards [mailto:machi...@rdc.co.za]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 7:20 AM
To: mysql mailing list
Subject: Another replication question
Hi All
I am back once again with another replication question (maybe this
can also be handled by MMM but not sure) this time for a different
clien
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:50 PM, John Daisley wrote:
> Are you sure mmm couldn't handle this?
>
That, I don't know, but MySQL's internal replication mechanisms definitely
don't support multimaster slaves. If mmm does it, it'll likely be akin to
the offline log shipping I proposed earlier.
> May
t;
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Machiel Richards >wrote:
>
> > Hi All
> >
> >I am back once again with another replication question (maybe this
> > can also be handled by MMM but not sure) this time for a different
> > client.
> >
> >
All
>
>I am back once again with another replication question (maybe this
> can also be handled by MMM but not sure) this time for a different
> client.
>
>We are trying to find out how to setup 3 different masters to
> replicate to a single slave server (without the ne
Hi All
I am back once again with another replication question (maybe this
can also be handled by MMM but not sure) this time for a different
client.
We are trying to find out how to setup 3 different masters to
replicate to a single slave server (without the need to have 3 different
Hi Ross,
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 16:44, Ross Simpson wrote:
> I have another question that doesn't seem to be addressed in the mysql
> manual.
>
> Does any sort of locking occur while a slave is updating it's local
> databases? Can I still read any/all tables while this process is
> occurring?
>
I have another question that doesn't seem to be addressed in the mysql
manual.
Does any sort of locking occur while a slave is updating it's local
databases? Can I still read any/all tables while this process is
occurring?
If there is locking, is the lock table-based or for the entire db?
My sl
13 matches
Mail list logo
