At 15:41 +0100 6/21/02, Bill Ferrett wrote:
>I would like to have a MySql table where each row has a unique id (using
>auto-increment) but is clustered, i.e. physically stored, in a different
>sequence, e.g. name. This is so that an sql query to order by namew will be
>quicker.
>
>I don't want th
In the last episode (Jun 21), Bill Ferrett said:
> I would like to have a MySql table where each row has a unique id
> (using auto-increment) but is clustered, i.e. physically stored, in a
> different sequence, e.g. name. This is so that an sql query to order
> by namew will be quicker.
>
> I do
I would like to have a MySql table where each row has a unique id (using
auto-increment) but is clustered, i.e. physically stored, in a different
sequence, e.g. name. This is so that an sql query to order by namew will be
quicker.
I don't want the auto-increment id to be duplicated - I believe t
