Re: avoiding "Locked" threads

2004-05-14 Thread Trevor Price
Jon, an update statement is supposed to return the # of rows updated, so the client must wait for a response, which means the client will wait if you low_priority your updates. But if they are insert delayed then the client gets a return immediately. This behavior limits the usefullness of low

Re: avoiding "Locked" threads

2004-05-14 Thread Jon Drukman
Dathan Vance Pattishall wrote: log-bin=/var/opt/mysql/db2-binlog skip-innodb log-error=/var/opt/mysql/db2-errlog This is on a separate drive? yes, the database is the only thing on the high speed RAID. everything else is on the other drive (also a RAID but only RAID0 with 2 drives). any ideas

RE: avoiding "Locked" threads

2004-05-13 Thread Dathan Vance Pattishall
> -Original Message- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Drukman > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 3:21 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: avoiding "Locked" threads > > I've got a very high traffic discussion forum database that is

avoiding "Locked" threads

2004-05-13 Thread Jon Drukman
I've got a very high traffic discussion forum database that is constantly running into a problem with lots and lots of threads in the "Locked" state. i was under the impression that MySQL could update/insert and select from the same table at the same time, but it doesn't seem to be the case.