.
Regards,
Gavin Towey
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Schwartz [mailto:jschwa...@the-infoshop.com]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 2:29 PM
To: 'Mike Spreitzer'
Cc: 'Michael Dykman'; mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: RE: incremental name search?
Beyond being leery of
zer [mailto:mspre...@us.ibm.com]
>Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 4:11 PM
>To: Jerry Schwartz
>Cc: 'Michael Dykman'; mysql@lists.mysql.com; Mike Spreitzer
>Subject: RE: incremental name search?
>
>Ah, yes, I forgot to describe the server and the load. Suppose my web app
&g
X: 860.674.8341
www.the-infoshop.com
>-Original Message-
>From: Mike Spreitzer [mailto:mspre...@us.ibm.com]
>Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 4:13 PM
>To: Martin Gainty
>Cc: Jerry Schwartz; 'Michael Dykman'; mysql@lists.mysql.com
>Subject: RE: incrementa
uot;'Michael Dykman'" , mysql@lists.mysql.com, Mike
Spreitzer/Watson/i...@ibmus
Subject
RE: incremental name search?
Ah, yes, I forgot to describe the server and the load. Suppose my web app
and MySQL are done via shared hosting by some common hosting business. I
do expect multiple
this going to fly, in terms of latency for the incremental lookups and
overall load at the hosting site?
Thanks
"Jerry Schwartz"
09/21/09 03:47 PM
To
"'Michael Dykman'" , Mike Spreitzer/Watson/i...@ibmus
cc
Subject
RE: incremental name search?
SoundEx doe
t donné que les email peuvent facilement
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> From: jschwa...@the-infoshop.com
> To: mdyk...@gmail.com; mspre...@us.ibm.com
> CC: mysql@lists.mysql.com
> Subject: RE: incremental name s
mysql@lists.mysql.com
>Subject: Re: incremental name search?
>
>Perhaps this could help you out..
>
>http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/string-functions.html#function_soundex
>
> - michael dykman
>
>On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
>> Su
Perhaps this could help you out..
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/string-functions.html#function_soundex
- michael dykman
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
> Suppose I have a table of a few thousand people, with a FirstName field
> and a LastName field. Sadly, my
Suppose I have a table of a few thousand people, with a FirstName field
and a LastName field. Sadly, my people are not so regular. Some names
have three parts (e.g., due to marriage) crammed into the two fields
("Hillary Rodham Clinton"). Some even have titles ("Dir, gastroent.
dept., Fubar
