Re: innodb deadlock leads to server crash

2003-03-03 Thread Heikki Tuuri
: innodb deadlock leads to server crash From: Heikki Tuuri Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:42:48 +0200 Hi! Ok, now I think I understand the problem. Since you use the -q option, the client mysql retrieves rows in the result set in chunks of some size. As InnoDB keeps the adaptive hash index latch S

Re: innodb deadlock leads to server crash

2003-03-03 Thread Heikki Tuuri
InnoDB. Thank you, Heikki - Original Message - From: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 10:24 AM Subject: Re: innodb deadlock leads to server crash > Hi! > > Your email address gives the error: > >

Re: innodb deadlock leads to server crash

2003-03-03 Thread Heikki Tuuri
MAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 10:05 AM Subject: Re: innodb deadlock leads to server crash > Hi! > > A deadlock of threads is a bug. It is is not connected to transactions or > multiversioning. > > Is the problem repeatable in your comp

Re: innodb deadlock leads to server crash

2003-03-02 Thread Heikki Tuuri
the online manual and latest news on InnoDB sql query - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: mailing.database.mysql Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 3:58 AM Subject: innodb deadlock leads to server crash > >Description: > A deadlock within innodb leads to

innodb deadlock leads to server crash

2003-03-02 Thread smurf
>Description: A deadlock within innodb leads to a server crash. I have a large table which I need to update in-place. So one mysql connection does a SELECT, and another updates the data. I thought that, since innodb supports transactions and multiversioning, the