Re: master and slave in same machine

2007-03-29 Thread Maciej Dobrzanski
In news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Rilawich Ango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found the the position in show master status also keep as 98 but I am sure the replication from S2 to S1 works. It seems that S2 master hasn't started yet. If by that you mean that you want the changes made on S1 to be

master and slave in same machine

2007-03-28 Thread Rilawich Ango
Hi, I tried to set a replication as below. S1(master) --- S2 (slave), (master) -- S3 (slave) I have set S1 and S2 (slave) without problem. However, there is a problem in S2 as a master. I found the the position in show master status also keep as 98 but I am sure the replication from S2 to S1