On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, DL Neil wrote:
...
What should be understood is that MySQL's implementation of AUTO_INCREMENT requires
a particular/different
philosophical view: that first the 'primary row' is to be stored, then the
AUTO_INCREMENT data captured, and
finally the dependent row is
William,
What should be understood is that MySQL's implementation of AUTO_INCREMENT
requires a particular/different
philosophical view: that first the 'primary row' is to be stored, then the
AUTO_INCREMENT data captured, and
finally the dependent row is stored (in the second table) - a
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, DL Neil wrote:
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 21:28:04 -
From: DL Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: William R. Mussatto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: next insert id (slightly OT)
William,
What should be understood is that MySQL's implementation
