Re: primary key performance

2005-01-13 Thread Brent Baisley
A varchar will take up less disk space than a char. A char is padded to fill it's length, so a index on char will be much larger than a varchar, depending on content. Numbers work differently. An index on a number column should be faster than the same sized char or varchar column. First a forem

Re: primary key performance

2005-01-13 Thread Philippe Poelvoorde
Hi, - 10 products in both cases. One time the column is a MediumInt, the other time a BigInt. I know there is a difference in disk space usage, but is there also one in performance at all ? I'm not sure, this apply to your case. I had set a unique index on a char(50) and it was 2x slower than

primary key performance

2005-01-12 Thread Daniel Dammann
I have a pretty standard database schema here with the primary key prod_id being my most often used join column in select queries. Categories, rankings .. just about anything having to do with products uses prod_id in a join, and user access on these queries is pretty heavy. I wonder whether the p