Brent Baisley wrote:
> Well, there is the ideal setup, which requires intimate knowledge of the
> database, lots of disks and extra administration. And then there is the
> easy setup. Ideally you don't want to have any "hot" disks which will
> cause contention. This requires you to place your bu
Well, there is the ideal setup, which requires intimate knowledge of the
database, lots of disks and extra administration. And then there is the
easy setup. Ideally you don't want to have any "hot" disks which will
cause contention. This requires you to place your busy tables (read or
write)
Thursday, 03 October 2002 21:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: raid vs splitting the database
sql, query
I have a dilemma and maybe you can help. I'm wanting to improve my
disk
performance and I'm wondering if I should go with Raid 10 or if I should
simply mirror the drives so
sql, query
I have a dilemma and maybe you can help. I'm wanting to improve my disk
performance and I'm wondering if I should go with Raid 10 or if I should
simply mirror the drives so that I have redundancy and then put some of my
tables on one drive and some on the other. Or the third
