Re: relational is relational is relational, but ...

2002-12-14 Thread David T-G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, all -- ...and then David T-G said... % % I apologize in advance for asking kindergarten-level questions on the % list, but my head is getting really bruised from this one. I'm trying to I still don't understand it all ;-) but I have a somewh

RE: RE: relational is relational is relational, but ...

2002-12-09 Thread Jon Frisby
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 6:00 PM > To: Jon Frisby > Subject: Re: RE: relational is relational is relational, but ... > > > Your message cannot be posted because it appears to be

Re: relational is relational is relational but ...

2002-12-06 Thread Peter Brawley
> Really, the issue is that you don't want a primary key that is volatile. > It doesn't matter if it has business meaning. Or user meaning, ie users find them useful signs. Fair enough, but if you take that as a rationale for choosing PK values that begin by having meaning to users, you leave your

RE: relational is relational is relational, but ...

2002-12-05 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Jon Frisby wrote: > However, from a DB design standpoint, it is generally considered > MASSIVELY unwise for your PRIMARY KEY value to have any > "business-meaning". If it has no "business-meaning", it never needs to > change. Ever. Really, the issue is that you don't want a

Re: relational is relational is relational, but ...

2002-12-04 Thread Peter Brawley
David, Not bang on. A foreign key is a key which is the value of a key from a 'parent' table. In MySQL, if the table and its parent are InnoDB, the db will prevent you from editing the parent key 'out of sync' as you say. PB - > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi again,

RE: relational is relational is relational, but ...

2002-12-03 Thread Adolfo Bello
l users > Subject: relational is relational is relational, but ... > ++ ++ > | SALES | | CUSTOMERS | > +-+---+--+ +--+-+ > | pro

RE: relational is relational is relational, but ...

2002-12-03 Thread Jon Frisby
d purposes, relational. -JF > -Original Message- > From: David T-G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 1:36 PM > To: mysql users > Subject: relational is relational is relational, but ... > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SH

relational is relational is relational, but ...

2002-12-03 Thread David T-G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi again, all -- I apologize in advance for asking kindergarten-level questions on the list, but my head is getting really bruised from this one. I'm trying to understand what makes a relational (not necessarily transactional) database and how, in wh