> From: Egor Egorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 10:51:08 + (UTC)
> Subject: Re: replicating FLUSH LOGS
>
> "Bill Easton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Under MySQL 3.23, FLUSH LOGS was replicated. Under 4.0.13, this appears
to
"Bill Easton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Under MySQL 3.23, FLUSH LOGS was replicated. Under 4.0.13, this appears to
> no longer be the case.
>
> Was this intentional? Could it be put back the way it was?
>
> We do backups by, at a time of low usage, (1) FLUSH LOGS on the master, (2)
> Dump th
Under MySQL 3.23, FLUSH LOGS was replicated. Under 4.0.13, this appears to
no longer be the case.
Was this intentional? Could it be put back the way it was?
We do backups by, at a time of low usage, (1) FLUSH LOGS on the master, (2)
Dump the master database, (3) repeat 1 and 2 until there were
